Recent posts

type	title	author	last post
Forum topic	New hex-axes search 2x faster than triple-axes search Improvements by rokicki	rokicki	10/29/2010 - 07:48
Forum topic	New optimal solutions for an important group Interestingly, even if you le by rokicki the fraction of cube space by Bruce Norskog Tom encouraged me to post som by silviu In order to explain it in a e by silviu It's a simple coset search. by rokicki How did you manage to do this by Herbert Kociemba This is absolutely amazing; o by rokicki Thank you for the improvement by silviu Made a minor edit by cubex Mark I have submitted this bu by silviu	silviu	10/29/2010 - 08:16
Forum topic	New Results, 13 Moves from Start, Quarter Turn Metric 2.80 Ghz Pentium 4, Windows/X by Jerry Bryan Technical details by cubex Table Lines up Correctly by Jerry Bryan Sorry the table looks so stra by Jerry Bryan It took about four months, ru by Jerry Bryan Hi Jerry, Can you give an by jaap	Jerry Bryan	10/29/2010 - 08:32
Forum topic	Non trivial identities Dimension in group theory ? by Rafoo Distinction between Physical Models and Mathematical Models by Jerry Bryan h dimensional space by B MacKenzie If you look at this way then by mdlazreg Correct. At least that is my by mdlazreg Yes I know that there is no g by mdlazreg I see. Thanks. Mathematica by mdlazreg re. Parameter Space by B MacKenzie Another Clarification by Jerry Bryan A Clarification by Jerry Bryan Parameter Space by B MacKenzie I am not sure what you mean b by mdlazreg Yes, I have the same feeling, by mdlazreg I was unaware that analysis. by B MacKenzie Actually all identities at 12 by mdlazreg FU U R U R' F' U U L' U' L FF' by Jerry Bryan Yes I agree, the identity man by mdlazreg Simple Cycle or Unique Simple Cycle and Symmetry by Jerry Bryan Conjugate relationships by B MacKenzie Correction by Jerry Bryan Commutitive Identities by B MacKenzie I would consider them as non by mdlazreg I am not sure about your argu by mdlazreg Hopefully, I haven't messed u by Jerry Bryan Identities and Commutivity by B MacKenzie I consider the identities abo by mdlazreg I think your example of Pons by mdlazreg Sorry, but I would call the i by Herbert Kociemba Backwards by Jerry Bryan Yes I was talking about QTM. by mdlazreg In fact I am not able to gene by mdlazreg Antipodes and Non-trivial Identities by Jerry Bryan I was able to generate subopt by mdlazreg It is not difficult to add su by Herbert Kociemba While I am happy your code ge by mdlazreg I think I figured out how the by mdlazreg Identities and Duplicate Positions by Jerry Bryan I used U U' for the input. T by Herbert Kociemba Identities at higher level by mdlazreg With my QTM otimal solver I g by Herbert Kociemba	mdlazreg	06/01/2012 - 02:40
Forum topic	Number of 4x4x4 positions for up to 5 moves (Comment is withdrawn) by stannic 4x4x4 supercube up to 7 block turns by Bruce Norskog results for 7 block turns by Bruce Norskog I have made some improvements by Bruce Norskog another update by Bruce Norskog more results by Bruce Norskog some deeper results by Bruce Norskog Nice work by rokicki	Bruce Norskog	08/18/2011 - 20:58
Forum topic	Number of canonical move sequences for nxnxn Rubik's cube in h-w metric Generating Function by kociemba Lower bounds in h-w metric by kociemba Formula for number of move seqences by kociemba	kociemba	12/10/2011 - 13:11
Forum topic	Number of canonical move sequences for nxnxn Rubik's cube in q-w metric This is amazing! Can you plea by mdlazreg Non recursive formula by kociemba	kociemba	04/25/2012 - 03:22
Forum topic	Number of maneuvers for Rubik's Cube Complication is in the eye of the beholder by Mike G Boundary Conditions by Jerry Bryan Cube Lovers Bounds by Jerry Bryan You are right, I overlooked t by Herbert Kociemba A little explanation by jaap Sorry, should be Round[(3+r)( by Herbert Kociemba	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 07:55
Forum topic	Numerical formula 4 or 1+1+1+1 by mdlazreg Rereading your First Post by Jerry Bryan Some things to check with your program by Jerry Bryan Thoughts about the recurrent formula by mdlazreg Numerical formula versus Mathematical formula by mdlazreg Reposted by rokicki A Further Clarification by Jerry Bryan The Funny Fudge Factors by Jerry Bryan	mdlazreg	10/29/2010 - 07:30
Forum topic	NxNxN cubes in GAP Yikes by secondmouse Symmetry Actions by B MacKenzie B MacKenzie, thanks for the i by Bruce Norskog The two formulas give the sam by Bruce Norskog Thanks for providing the link by secondmouse Confirmation by B MacKenzie Group size with parity restrictions by jaap Ignore the symmetry group comment please by secondmouse well, I made no attempt to wr by Bruce Norskog Factor of 2 explanation by Bruce Norskog Ah so ... I am very much mistaken by secondmouse Why the positions do not form a group by Bruce Norskog Not true by secondmouse 2x2x2x2 group by secondmouse Oops, in my previous post, of by Bruce Norskog Indeed by brac37 The number of elements in the by Bruce Norskog Works well for the 2x2x2 and by secondmouse	Bruce Norskog	06/01/2012 - 02:36
first page previous page ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... next page last page