Back to Main
cube archives
cube files
Indexed Cube Lovers Archive
FAQ
GAP files
2x2x2 cube
3x3x3 cube
megaminx
skewb
VIP sphere
Blogs
cubezzz.dyndns.org/drupal is once again active
Remember to use http://forum.cubeman.org
Finally hitting depth 13 consistently with my 5x5x5 solver
IP address for forum changed to 69.165.220.244
Cube archives changed
Router Problem
Old Domain Names now restored
Domain name changed (again)
3x3x3 edges only calculations restored
Back from the Brink
more
Forum topics
Active forum topics:
God's algorithm for megaminx <U,R>
All 3x3x3 involutions solved
Lower bounds for the 3x3x3 Super Group
Does the STOP-cube have a second type of solution?
Diameter of the M24 Conway puzzle is 45
New forum topics:
God's algorithm for megaminx <U,R>
All 3x3x3 involutions solved
Does the STOP-cube have a second type of solution?
Diameter of the M24 Conway puzzle is 45
Deficiency minus one presentation for the Tits Group
more
User login
Username:
Password:
Create new account
Request new password
Navigation
recent posts
Who's new
bazilisek
Andrew Skalski
ortwin
jAnoniem
Johan.de.Ruiter
Home
Recent posts
type
title
author
last post
Forum topic
Symmetric Cube Positions with more than 4 symmetries
I've done an analysis of your
by
rokicki
Symmetry reductions
by
Herbert Kociemba
Symmetric search actually is
by
rokicki
I think you mean less or equa
by
Herbert Kociemba
Dan Hoey (a frequent contribu
by
Jerry Bryan
Naming symmetries
by
rokicki
Nice work!!! Are you going to
by
silviu
Herbert Kociemba
10/29/2010 - 08:21
Forum topic
Non trivial identities
Dimension in group theory ?
by
Rafoo
Distinction between Physical Models and Mathematical Models
by
Jerry Bryan
h dimensional space
by
B MacKenzie
If you look at this way then
by
mdlazreg
Correct. At least that is my
by
mdlazreg
Yes I know that there is no g
by
mdlazreg
I see. Thanks. Mathematica
by
mdlazreg
re. Parameter Space
by
B MacKenzie
Another Clarification
by
Jerry Bryan
A Clarification
by
Jerry Bryan
Parameter Space
by
B MacKenzie
I am not sure what you mean b
by
mdlazreg
Yes, I have the same feeling,
by
mdlazreg
I was unaware that analysis.
by
B MacKenzie
Actually all identities at 12
by
mdlazreg
F*U U R U R' F' U U L' U' L F*F'
by
Jerry Bryan
Yes I agree, the identity man
by
mdlazreg
Simple Cycle or Unique Simple Cycle and Symmetry
by
Jerry Bryan
Conjugate relationships
by
B MacKenzie
Correction
by
Jerry Bryan
Commutitive Identities
by
B MacKenzie
I would consider them as non
by
mdlazreg
I am not sure about your argu
by
mdlazreg
Hopefully, I haven't messed u
by
Jerry Bryan
Identities and Commutivity
by
B MacKenzie
I consider the identities abo
by
mdlazreg
I think your example of Pons
by
mdlazreg
Sorry, but I would call the i
by
Herbert Kociemba
Backwards
by
Jerry Bryan
Yes I was talking about QTM.
by
mdlazreg
In fact I am not able to gene
by
mdlazreg
Antipodes and Non-trivial Identities
by
Jerry Bryan
I was able to generate subopt
by
mdlazreg
It is not difficult to add su
by
Herbert Kociemba
While I am happy your code ge
by
mdlazreg
I think I figured out how the
by
mdlazreg
Identities and Duplicate Positions
by
Jerry Bryan
I used U U' for the input. T
by
Herbert Kociemba
Identities at higher level
by
mdlazreg
With my QTM otimal solver I g
by
Herbert Kociemba
mdlazreg
06/01/2012 - 02:40
Forum topic
Slice turn metric, anyone?
Slice turn vs Axial Turn
by
rokicki
SPTM (ATM) exact count
by
Andrew Gould
Axial solutions
by
Andrew Gould
The reason I showed the list
by
NoLongerUnsolve...
Well, clearly your list has p
by
Bruce Norskog
My counts for 3x3x3 with 27 nodes at depth 1
by
NoLongerUnsolve...
Nice
by
rokicki
S6 cubes
by
Rafoo
18*s
by
Rafoo
Distance 18s*'s
by
rokicki
SQTM? I prefer QSTM.
by
brac37
some axial metric numbers
by
Bruce Norskog
Axes metric?
by
brac37
So let me add 11
by
tscheunemann
Confirmed!
by
rokicki
some SQTM numbers
by
Bruce Norskog
SQTM
by
rokicki
Other metrics
by
Rafoo
rokicki
05/23/2018 - 18:33
Forum topic
4x4x4 upper bounds: 57 OBTM confirmed; 56 SST and 53 BT calculated.
4x4x4 new upper bound: 53 SSTM
by
CS
I don't do stage 2 without br
by
CS
How do you do stage 2 without
by
charlie
4x4x4 new upper bound: 55 OBTM
by
CS
rokicki
03/09/2015 - 10:43
Forum topic
Two more classes with exacly 4 symmetries done - most 20f* are antisymmetric
Wow, good point! I tend to o
by
rokicki
Thanks -- that's clearer. I
by
Mike G
I can give you a stochastic a
by
rokicki
First things first...
by
Mike G
Great work! Of the 771 kno
by
rokicki
Herbert Kociemba
10/29/2010 - 08:16
Forum topic
U turn sans U turns
I remember reading an old book
by
jcm
re Five Face Puzzle
by
B MacKenzie
There are shorter maneuvers f
by
kociemba
B MacKenzie
10/29/2010 - 07:41
Forum topic
PSL(2,7) embeds in the 2x2x2 cube group
Some nice presentations for PGL(2,q)
by
secondmouse
Extending to PGL(2,7) and correction
by
secondmouse
Since the Mathieu M12 group c
by
Bruce Norskog
secondmouse
02/13/2011 - 11:38
Forum topic
Super Cube States at Depth
got to distance 10
by
Bruce Norskog
Thanks
by
B MacKenzie
partial confirmation
by
Bruce Norskog
B MacKenzie
06/18/2016 - 10:25
Forum topic
The 4x4x4 can be solved in 79 moves (STM)
Stage 4 details and symmetry-reduced results
by
Bruce Norskog
Bruce Norskog
10/29/2010 - 08:11
Forum topic
100,000 cubes optimally solved
Adding Branching Factors to the Mix
by
Jerry Bryan
Matches
by
rokicki
kociemba
10/29/2010 - 07:37
first page
previous page
...
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
...
next page
last page
Browse archives
«
January 2025
Su
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
God's Algorithm Calculations
Poll
www.olympicube.com need cube lovers opinion on which cube to produce first
olympic cube 6a
83%
olympic cube 6b
17%
Total votes: 23
6 comments
|
older polls
Syndicate