Recent posts

type	title	author	last post
Forum topic	100,000 cubes optimally solved Adding Branching Factors to the Mix by Jerry Bryan Matches by rokicki	kociemba	10/29/2010 - 07:37
Forum topic	Number of canonical move sequences for nxnxn Rubik's cube in q-w metric This is amazing! Can you plea by mdlazreg Non recursive formula by kociemba	kociemba	04/25/2012 - 03:22
Forum topic	Number of canonical move sequences for nxnxn Rubik's cube in h-w metric Generating Function by kociemba Lower bounds in h-w metric by kociemba Formula for number of move seqences by kociemba	kociemba	12/10/2011 - 13:11
Forum topic	Relation between positions and positions mod M in FTM Antisymmetric positions by brac37 I am quite sure, that the num by kociemba Very nice by rokicki	kociemba	12/08/2010 - 09:35
Forum topic	Symmetries and coset actions (Nintendo Ten Billion Barrel tumbler puzzle) Schreier analysis by B MacKenzie Great results! by rokicki Deep Cosets by B MacKenzie Corroboration by B MacKenzie Concur by rokicki I have made similar changes by B MacKenzie The no flip case by rokicki It's a lot of fun to hear how by loseyourmarblesblog Alternate Solutions by B MacKenzie Can confirm these are both de by loseyourmarblesblog Have verified the depth distr by loseyourmarblesblog Estimates by B MacKenzie Congratulations! by loseyourmarblesblog Antipodes by B MacKenzie Supercomputers by rokicki Kudos by B MacKenzie Diameter is 18 by rokicki Wonderful! by rokicki Have verified the counts for by loseyourmarblesblog Happy to be of help, between by loseyourmarblesblog Current bound: 19 by rokicki A different coset---upper bound now 23 by rokicki "Trivial" coset solved---new bound = 26 by rokicki Test Results by B MacKenzie My Bad by B MacKenzie I'm missing solutions by B MacKenzie I've output my 3417 depth 13 by loseyourmarblesblog Incorrect Counts by B MacKenzie My numbers were a little more by loseyourmarblesblog Coset solved by B MacKenzie It's not just the symmetry by loseyourmarblesblog Color degeneracy by B MacKenzie Match these figures by loseyourmarblesblog Whoops by B MacKenzie Distance through depth 13 by rokicki Thank you. My confidence is by B MacKenzie Confirmed by loseyourmarblesblog This is exactly right. The " by rokicki Concur with estimates by loseyourmarblesblog Depth 19 positions? by B MacKenzie Standard Configuration Strings by B MacKenzie Great! by rokicki Depth 18 confirmed by B MacKenzie Howdy! by rokicki Optimal Solver by B MacKenzie Probably not as good as rokicki's... by loseyourmarblesblog how to do fast moves on such indexing? by CS Pruning independently by loseyourmarblesblog Move pruning by rokicki Impressive by loseyourmarblesblog Optimal solver by rokicki Flipping by loseyourmarblesblog Puzzle by rokicki	loseyourmarblesblog	11/22/2013 - 16:00
Forum topic	Square One God's Algorithm Computed > perhaps minor variations on by jaap > the extra factor of 2 (real by Mike G 10 moves max by masonjones God's algorithm counts by masonjones Of course, 7 flips is best for parity fix for Square One by masonjones Great to see this follow-up t by Mike G	masonjones	10/29/2010 - 08:21
Forum topic	An interesting conjugate class	mdlazreg	10/29/2010 - 07:22
Forum topic	Non trivial identities Dimension in group theory ? by Rafoo Distinction between Physical Models and Mathematical Models by Jerry Bryan h dimensional space by B MacKenzie If you look at this way then by mdlazreg Correct. At least that is my by mdlazreg Yes I know that there is no g by mdlazreg I see. Thanks. Mathematica by mdlazreg re. Parameter Space by B MacKenzie Another Clarification by Jerry Bryan A Clarification by Jerry Bryan Parameter Space by B MacKenzie I am not sure what you mean b by mdlazreg Yes, I have the same feeling, by mdlazreg I was unaware that analysis. by B MacKenzie Actually all identities at 12 by mdlazreg FU U R U R' F' U U L' U' L FF' by Jerry Bryan Yes I agree, the identity man by mdlazreg Simple Cycle or Unique Simple Cycle and Symmetry by Jerry Bryan Conjugate relationships by B MacKenzie Correction by Jerry Bryan Commutitive Identities by B MacKenzie I would consider them as non by mdlazreg I am not sure about your argu by mdlazreg Hopefully, I haven't messed u by Jerry Bryan Identities and Commutivity by B MacKenzie I consider the identities abo by mdlazreg I think your example of Pons by mdlazreg Sorry, but I would call the i by Herbert Kociemba Backwards by Jerry Bryan Yes I was talking about QTM. by mdlazreg In fact I am not able to gene by mdlazreg Antipodes and Non-trivial Identities by Jerry Bryan I was able to generate subopt by mdlazreg It is not difficult to add su by Herbert Kociemba While I am happy your code ge by mdlazreg I think I figured out how the by mdlazreg Identities and Duplicate Positions by Jerry Bryan I used U U' for the input. T by Herbert Kociemba Identities at higher level by mdlazreg With my QTM otimal solver I g by Herbert Kociemba	mdlazreg	06/01/2012 - 02:40
Forum topic	Lower bound using the Edges antipode about my calculation by Bruce Norskog Hi Bruce, by mdlazreg Y >= 14 by Bruce Norskog X IS equal to 22 by mdlazreg Hi Bruce, by mdlazreg Re: Lower bound using the Edges antipode by Bruce Norskog	mdlazreg	06/01/2012 - 02:39
Forum topic	Fast solver for arbitrary target groups GAP for prunning by mdlazreg My common property is anti-symmetry by brac37	mdlazreg	06/01/2012 - 02:29
first page previous page ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... next page last page