Recent posts

type	title	author	last post
Forum topic	Megaminx needs at least 45 moves My argumentation is flawed by Herbert Kociemba Upper bound? by IAssemble Computation in qtm by Herbert Kociemba	Herbert Kociemba	08/21/2016 - 02:28
Forum topic	Classification of the symmetries and antisymmetries of Rubik's cube Summary of symmetric and antisymmetric cube classification by Herbert Kociemba	Herbert Kociemba	05/10/2014 - 14:47
Forum topic	39 cubes with 20f moves in a class with 4 symmetries I recommend to take a look at by Herbert Kociemba May I also have a copy of that? by xintax Queastion regarding the Process by xintax Email by rokicki Please give me your email add by Herbert Kociemba Is it possible for me to get by rokicki That's still stunningly fast; by rokicki The first 26 are selfinverse, by Herbert Kociemba It is the time for the whole by Herbert Kociemba Hmm, all these positions are by rokicki Wow, that's great! I'm jus by rokicki	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 08:17
Forum topic	Some thoughts about a proof, that 24 moves suffice Runtime: 20 vs 22 by rokicki If you take these 253605 cose by Herbert Kociemba For a proof of 23 by rokicki I think a made a mistake above by Herbert Kociemba Great topic! by rokicki	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 07:45
Forum topic	Symmetric Cube Positions with more than 4 symmetries I've done an analysis of your by rokicki Symmetry reductions by Herbert Kociemba Symmetric search actually is by rokicki I think you mean less or equa by Herbert Kociemba Dan Hoey (a frequent contribu by Jerry Bryan Naming symmetries by rokicki Nice work!!! Are you going to by silviu	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 08:21
Forum topic	Two more classes with exacly 4 symmetries done - most 20f* are antisymmetric Wow, good point! I tend to o by rokicki Thanks -- that's clearer. I by Mike G I can give you a stochastic a by rokicki First things first... by Mike G Great work! Of the 771 kno by rokicki	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 08:16
Forum topic	Number of maneuvers for Rubik's Cube Complication is in the eye of the beholder by Mike G Boundary Conditions by Jerry Bryan Cube Lovers Bounds by Jerry Bryan You are right, I overlooked t by Herbert Kociemba A little explanation by jaap Sorry, should be Round[(3+r)( by Herbert Kociemba	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 07:55
Forum topic	Orientation of pieces in permutation puzzles Thanks for the reference, I w by Herbert Kociemba Singmaster's proof by jaap	Herbert Kociemba	09/27/2014 - 12:11
Forum topic	Analysis of another two symmetry subgroups of order 4 I always run the two-phase-so by Herbert Kociemba Excellent work! I wonder how by rokicki	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 08:16
Forum topic	Representation of edge permutations and move table Performance by Herbert Kociemba EP sym-coordinate typically unnecessary by Bruce Norskog I am not sure which but I can by silviu Ok, if you say it is a group by Herbert Kociemba performance for edge permutation only - FTM by Bruce Norskog Yes I mean the 48 symmetries by silviu I do not understand your argu by Herbert Kociemba I found out using GAP that if by silviu Was it worth the effort to im by Herbert Kociemba Implementing Herbert's idea by Bruce Norskog I took a different approach by Bruce Norskog	Herbert Kociemba	10/29/2010 - 07:52
first page previous page ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... next page last page